The reality

~ ~ A Life Without Problem And Death ~ ~

2007-02-17T00:05:00.000-08:00

A gambler suddenly awoke and realised that he was no longer on earth but in heaven. During his time on earth, he had wished to gamble to his heart's content when he would be in heaven. Here he would be with the most beautiful damsels around, sumptupus foods and in the most beautiful place he had ever seen. Without wasting time, he tried his hand on the betting table and his luck does not leave him as he started winning.He went on winning day after day, week after week, month after month and even year after year.
Gradually he started to get annoyed and restless with the routine. Nothing changed:There were the same beautiful women, sumptuous foods, beautiful place, pleasant perfume and other heavenly pleasures.One day he approached the one in charge of heaven and told him that he was extremely restless and bored.He asked to be moved to some other place."But there is no other place for you as this is what you have sought during your whole life.In fact this is the other place", came the reply.
Now just imagine a life without problems and death! If that happened people would be bored to death or become mad. Fortunately, the mind is here to seek for trouble all the time and also fortunately there is death. What are human beings aiming at by developing more advanced technology in all fields of science and arts? No illness, no famine, mechanisation and computerisation of almost all systems of work. Then what will people do? The mind will always find some occupation and create sufferings so that it can assert itself. It is a psychological fact that deep within, people do not want to get liberated from their suffering, This is why, consciously or unconsciously, they are always creating new circumstances in which they are caught.
Now if you try to be calm and silent for a few hours, watching the inner mechanism so that you can know what inner silence is? Are all your cause and sufferings is the absence of inner silence? Is the cause within or without? Are you only a witness to the world? Are your eyes really seeing all that you should? Are you finding scapegoats or can't face yourself? So make move an invite your inner silence!!!!!... ~~ NITIN ~~

Mauritius Government

2007-02-07T11:55:00.000-08:00

Well hi me doing this for the sake of a friend telling me to do it....I’m Navin n I ran away from My own country as politic had started taking over everything, I knew that the way it was going well it would become how it is today. I left 4 years Ago now am in UK doing me last year of Civil Engineering.

I’ve tried my best to write this in simplest form so as every single people reading this could understand.

Many things will n have changed since Politic have started taking control over Mauritius. I’m not against any political parties as even if tomorrow I become a memeber of Mauritian political group well, I would definitely steal as this is a kind of Obligation that every1 entering this group have made over these years…

Due to this Politic well My Mauritius is being changed for the worst in all aspects n will continue till something is done. I won’t be going in too many details about this but still I’ve got some stuff to remind people.

There was a time when people used to fight for their political parties well I class those people as fools as due to their own fault that Mauritius is Down as it is. Funny thing I can’t understand is after a person have worked very hard to achieve a proper education well, there is no work for him unless he get to know a Member Of I’ll say “Political Party” n that as well he must know a High kind of Level person in that department then beg for a recommendation letter for a job…

Now we come on CyberCity that have been created well, this as well will go down soon as politic have started taking over, CyberCity is n was meant to compete with other countries, which it is doing but, I say if Politics intefers ,well then cybercity progress with stay just in the middle of the ladder….
But there is not just bad things there is only 1 thing that is holding on n will always will hold on… Political conflicts between several parties allowed for a great how can i say a major beautiful mistake that will keep hold of Mauritius.. many foolish people still think that making french people take over control over Mauritius Telecom was the worst ever decision made by how can i say "Politics", but I say…
Best "mistake" or "decison" i dont know which 1, but anyway the decision have had many gud impacts on all of us mauritians as due to that the only main gud thing that had happen was creation of jobs.

Compare what else jobs have been created which didn`t involve the cybercity or the telecom.

I think that till now u see clever people taking up decisions about i give u a simple example that most of people will know which is Roadworks.

Well ladies n gentleman am not too much in politics welll this is all i can give u information about.

Bye n take care every1 hope that I have written something that might change some stuff or even better make people think about future…n try to find solution for this problem…..

Lebanon crisis

2007-02-03T10:01:00.000-08:00

The world community: At the feet of Lebanon in crisis in Paris. Some 40 countries and 14 International institutions, joining themselves to help Lebanon to overcome its disastrous economic crisis.

Great personalities of the world had taken part in this forum, namely President Chirac, U.S state secretary Condoleezza Rice. They did discuss on giving a new life to the Lebanon economy and the country’s production and they did talk about restoring its economic condition. However, have you ever think about their real goal???/…as much, as I know nothing is given free in this world.... (BY NASIF)

From the WOMB to the TOMB!! ~~How many have fight for their democratic rights?

2007-01-29T10:04:00.000-08:00

From the WOMB to the TOMB!! ~~How many have fight for their democratic rights?

The universe is nearly infinite in grandeur. The human life is next to nothing compared to the life cycle and vastness of this wonder-filled existence. Our life begins from the womb and ends in the tomb. Could there be more to what our lives are between the womb and the tomb? If yes, then Solomon is absolutely right: everything is vanity, illusive and horrible. The child is perfectly unconscious, at least up to a certain age. That produces innocence, purity and beauty in it. During the last stage of life when one foot is on earth and another is being pulled by the tomb, man becomes a strange creature. People usually say that the old ones are child-like. But far from being innocent, pure and unconscious like the child, the elderly person has become cunning, ugly and miserly. He has grown up only physically, his development has not been mental. Life has been only a struggle to fulfil the basic needs and a few sensual pleasures. Throughout this journey, he has developed so many ugly qualities such as greed, anger, jealousy, lust and others.My own observation is that the mind has to undergo a complete transformation. Prior to that, it has to be understood how the present situation has ensnared the mind. For that purpose, psychology and scientific spiritual practices like Yoga can be of much help. A global understanding of the nature of man, God and the Universe would be of paramount importance. Some religions lay great emphasis on our eating habits. Could it be that the food we consume influences our mind and its behaviour? The thought process and the different levels of our consciousness have to be studied. I am fully convinced that the real solution to all problems lies with religion. Of course, I mean that religion can be used as a means, not as an end. The end and aim is to go beyond all forms of conflict and sorrow so as to attain never-ending bliss. ~~

nitin MUTKAWOA

Democracy vs Individual liberty[ YUsha Prisheela Mottee]

2007-01-21T01:03:00.000-08:00

Nowadays we hear a lot about democratic states but what about individual liberty is it preserved in a democracy ??

CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT FOR PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST !

2007-01-19T01:39:00.000-08:00

Curriculum development for putting people first!! - -

No teaching or education system is successful if learning does not take place; therefore there are certain pedagogical conditions which are required. Initially the trained teachers will focus on the proposed pedagogy and eventually many approaches can be transferred to all teaching leaching learning situations, for development of body, mind and heart happens all the time; although the self education classes will focus only the aspects proposed as content of the program,
The teacher is the first experimenter who puts to practice these skills as life skills so that they are capable of discussing with students the progress made, difficulties faced and further action required. Role modeling is very effective.
This is a highly interactive learning because the golden rule is practice for it is fully skills based. Hence learning by doing is the motto.
Participation for exchange of ideas, frank talk, talking about oneself usually more conveniently successful call for peer learning, group activities and individual reflection. Encouragement for sincerity with oneself, acceptance of one’s own reality within a given context and discovery of strengths through “no wrong but area for further development concept” will be a highly effective approach. No sense of guilt but an opportunity for setting higher targets through a lesson learnt will form an integral part of the pedagogy.
Therapeutic skills coupled with theoretical knowledge about their benefits, backed by related literature will be incorporated in the strategy.
Exposure to cognitive aspects will incorporate more audiovisual means, literature and Knowledge Hub concept.
Enquiry, questioning, free discussions and pastoral needs expressed by students will form an integral part of the pedagogy since this subject will cause students to bring to surface their complexes and blockages which when repressed ultimately result in behavioral disfunctioning.
Appropriate overall school approach is required to enable an integral approach in the unfurling of the individual.

Dear friends . . should you not be interested for the so called type of education?

encouragement comment for nasif from anonymous

2007-01-17T22:28:00.000-08:00

... your vision and actions may lead to a better future...

[Thanxs from nasif and the team ]

The Future,according to Nostradamus......Nasif

2007-01-17T01:07:00.000-08:00

"A very bright, previously unknown comet will appear and coincide with the time of great geological troubles, with earthquakes and volcanoes erupting and disrupting weather systems." This is accordingly to Nostradamus prophecies.
In this ,he subjected the United States in particular,as the targets to serious natural disasters,particularly earthquakes and flooding, and flatten the nation from end to end, causing enormous conflict, despair, and misery. The US will be bankrupted attempting to deal with its disasters. Three other great nations will send aid to help the citizens survive.
Even in the European countries,and in the Middle east,severe floods will generate large number of death,nearly chaos,it will be. .
Serious economic problems will persist along with great social unrest, contributing to the ease with which the Antichrist can seize power. The frightened and hopeful populace will be vulnerable to his rhetoric. The Antichrist will use the disasters as opportunities to overthrow governments and sneak spies into a country. Martial law will be declared in many areas to stop rioting and looting. The Middle East, the source of his power, will not be as devastated as the rest of the world. He offers assistance to other countries trying to recover but he will eventually stab them in the back.

A global mental transformation [ Prisheela Yusha Mottee]

2007-01-05T21:50:00.000-08:00

Well the idea of a global mental transformation is not bad ,thats why we say to change the mentality set which is impossible to happen ..In this materialistic world everyone think of their own and no one else ,due to this factor our world will never come to an end ..When the third class countries take one step for survival , the proletariat take ten steps ahead because they have power ..Never underestimate human mind and will power to survive

Nitin Mutkawoa point of view

2007-01-05T21:48:00.000-08:00

It is indeed surprising that though the leaders of society know that without inner peace nothing can be achieved, yet nothing really effective is being done. Even if there is any mild outcry for peace anywhere, it is only a lip-service. Education in human values, living values, model UN programs, seminars, commandments, prayers, rituals and celebration of festivals, be they religious, social or cultural, have all failed and will continue to do so. When shall we understand that 95.5% of unconsciousness is not a child’s play to do away with? Psychology and religion will have to join forces so as to help to make the greatest revolution in the psyche of man on an international level - - Dear friends dont we need a global mental transformation??.. Its suprising that we have got so many religious, political institutions, schools of so many different kind, big research are being made yet we are in the dark- our world is going to be dissapear soon. Just reflect a bit on that...
05 January, 2007 21:44

Comment from subanna

2007-01-01T21:58:00.000-08:00

uhhh seems u tried really hard but vats great z blog....wil really b successful i wish u all good luk may God Bless U all wow really its too good well there r thngs which wil really help others

Thanks subanna from the team

Saddam = destroyer [ Yusha Prisheela Mottee]

2006-12-30T09:13:00.000-08:00

Born from a poor family and executed [hanged to death at dawn ] -Saddam Hussein

Today a dicatator was killed ...but violence is still present in all the way he went through ..

The question remain who will benefit from his death ??

Comment of anonymous [answer from Yusha Prisheela Mottee]

2006-12-29T09:08:00.000-08:00

Anonymous

its all BULLSHIT guys.just go and fuck yourselfs sons of bitchs.go sell ya dicks and pussy.then u'll lots of commentshahah!!!fuck your full of crap!!!!!!!!!!!

Whoever you are .. I ..Prisheela Yusha MOttee do respect your point of view,you seem to be immature to use such a language or perhaps its due to anger you ve written so ..

If the blog is crap ,i propose u to become a member and contact me on yusha_16@hotmail.com
to get the password to post your articles

Its a challenge change the blog

yusha

encouragement comment [anonymous ]

2006-12-26T07:44:00.001-08:00

nice blog yusha n z rest..kip it up

[THXS FROM THE TEAM]

Does the Future Belong to China?(Nasif)

2006-12-26T05:14:00.000-08:00

China's rise is no longer a prediction. It is a fact. It is already the world's fastest-growing large economy, and the second largest holder of foreign-exchange reserves, mainly dollars. It has the world's largest army (2.5 million men) and the fourth largest defense budget, which is rising by more than 10 percent annually. Whether or not it overtakes the United States economically, which looks to me like a distant prospect, it is the powerful new force on the global scene.
China's growth has obvious and amazing benefits for the world, and in particular for America. A report shows that cheap imports from China have saved American consumers more than $600 billion in the past decade. They have saved manufacturers even more. The Economist magazine notes that "it was largely thanks to China's robust growth that the world as a whole escaped recession after America's stockmarket bubble burst in 2000-01." And by buying up U.S. Treasury bills, China—along with other Asian countries—have allowed Americans and their government to keep borrowing and spending, and thus to keep the world economy going.All thes probably r the effects of the 11/09....still haunting america!!!
There have been two great shifts in global power.The first was the rise of Europe, which around the 17th century became the richest, most enterprising and ambitious part of the world. The second was the rise of the United States, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when it became the single most powerful country in the world, the globe's decisive player in economics and politics.Still today,amerique is said to be the sole world power,but for how much time further???
For centuries, the rest of the world was a stage for the ambitions and interests of the West's great powers. China's rise, along with that of India and the continuing weight of Japan, represents the third great shift in global power—the rise of Asia.
Great powers are not born every day. The list of current ones—the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia—has been mostly the same for two centuries. The arrival of a new one usually produces tension if not turmoil, as the newcomer tries to fit into the established order—or overturns it to suit its purposes. Think of the rise of Germany and Japan in the early 20th century, or the decline of the Ottoman Empire in that same period, which created the modern Middle East.
Great-power conflict is something the world has not seen since the cold war. But if it were to begin, all the troubles we worry about now—terrorism, Iran, North Korea—would decrease in comparison. It would mean arms races, border troubles, and perhaps more. Even without those dire scenarios, China complicates international life. Take relations between the United States and Europe. Iraq was a temporary problem. But differing attitudes on the rise of China are likely to produce permanent strains in the Western Alliance.
Inevitably, the China challenge looms largest for the United States. Historically, when the world's leading power is challenged by a rising one, the two have had a difficult relationship. And while neither side will ever admit it publicly, both China and the United States worry and plan for trouble. To say this is not to assume war or even conflict, but merely to note that there is likely to be tension between the two countries. How both sides handle it will determine their future relations—and the peace of the world.Lets just watch it!!!

Encouragement from Yan -minis

2006-12-25T22:51:00.001-08:00

Nice blog xxxxx! keep it up!

[Thks from the team]

Encouragement comment ...from anonymous

2006-12-25T22:49:00.000-08:00

What i sincerely think about this blog is that (without taking in consideration about the prior contents) (First thought) is that Politics still has its interest.Thats very interesting ang shocking too abt the high, deep and level of thoughts about particular topics about politics.Some makes us think even though some are baseless.

[Thanks from the team ]

“…under the name of religion”: Religion or misinterpretation of Religion???? [Bilaal Mauntah]

2006-12-21T02:21:00.000-08:00

The first thing that comes in my mind when I read your post is misinterpretation and mixed up ideas. Your emphasis is more on RELIGION rather than fascism itself.
First of all, I want to clear something. Islam puts a lot of emphasis on respect and tolerance of other faiths. Don’t think that if some radicalised Muslims have so much hatred vis-à-vis other religions, it is the case for all Muslims over the world. The Koran is full of exhortations asking you as to why you “hear not”, “see not”, “think not”, “use not reason”, “ponder not”. The Koran encourages you to stop, think and make your conclusion. Your point of view on a subject may be different to mine. This is why it exists much school of thoughts in Islam. Still, false dogmas are created and used by radicals.
In addition, I quote from your post, “Women are forced to wear gloves and veils, civil servants and professors are subjected to religious and political tests.” My question to you is: Is it the religion that imposes such things or is it statesmen or individuals??? Are they driven by religion or is it that religion is used as a disguise to exert some sort of power? Does these organizations use religion to have maximum people at their side? Does they use such comments like you did to radicalise people and attract them at their side? My question here is: do you have any clues of the type of religious organization in operation in the country you mentioned? Any individual from any faith, be it you or I, have the right to follow any religion he/she wishes in all Islamic countries. Someone born in a Muslim family has the right to follow Islam if he/she wishes or not. A Muslim woman may choose to wear veil or not. It’s HER choice. Do not blame the RELIGION but blame,
(a) The persons who have false dogmas of religion and who imposed such things against women or else blame those false dogmas simply
(b) The authority they enjoy, blame those civilians who keep quiet of the actions of these organizations
This is the most important error you made. Because these persons has misinterpreted Islam and you have come to conclusions without proper research and study.
Lastly, I must say that it’s a topic to be talked of but your approach was not appropriate. I have not written all this to justify Islam. Islam needs no justification but to justify democracy and the liberty to choose religion and to avoid any further misunderstanding or misinterpretation like you were subject.
I have posted the whole critic I made as a comment to your post. You can see to it.

"Mussolini beliefs " [Prisheela Yusha Mottee ]

2006-12-19T22:26:00.000-08:00

Mussolini had openely said
"We aristocrats and democrats ,revolutionaries and reactionaries ,proletarians and anti- proletarians ,pacifists and anti-pacifists.It is sufficient to have a single aim _the nation.The rest is obvious " [BASIC FACTS SERIES POLITICAL SCIENCE ,Page 250 ],
individual liberty not being preserved under facism rule,led to dictatorship and broke out in world war 2 due to the misinterpretation of the meaning of democracy.

Reaching the year 2006 ,the meaning of democracy is still wrongly interpreted in certain part of the muslim world where religious organisations rule as dictators .In a seminal article written in the Newsweek 13 February 2006 Fareed http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10966808/site/newsweek/ Zakaria said democracy and individual liberty is one of the most important fact which the muslim world want to achieve.The main reasons for preserving individual libery in Iraq is because human rights are not respected.The examples given by Zakaria are as follows: Women are forced to wear gloves and veils ,civil servants and professors are subjected to religious and political tests .Such a situation occured because inidividual liberty was not preserved and thus , the democratic state transfomed into tyranny under the name of religion.

Mussolini s belief is born again in form of religious organisation acting as dictators ...ITS A SHAME

Power and Dominance [Bilaal Mauntah]

2006-12-19T15:13:00.000-08:00

Even abstract and complex, power and dominance in the international system are worth discussing. The actions of a state are guided by motives. The primary motive of states and therefore statesman is power. A sort of domination on another individual or a state. They will protect their own interest at any cost. Even killing that is war. But don’t you think that for present times where anyone can speak freely, we have free press and so on, this fact is savage, barbarian and meant for the past. Why is it not changing? How can we change it?? First of all, we normal people can we make things change? Or else can we aspire to make things change? Difficult question…
Let’s take the case of a superpower. In a unipolar world we are living, USA doesn’t have any constraints exerted from other states (external constraints). The root of change may come from inside that is internally, from the people within the state. But is it working? So many strikes were organised against the war in Iraq to the point that Bush popularity came at its lowest level ever. But nothing happened. Even through the votes, no one will be able to change things. Each newly elected will have the same role, the same target and the same goal like his predecessor he wants it or not. This is the system. He/she has the responsibility to maintain the state at its powerful crescendo. Failing to do so, he/she may loose in future elections and may loose power and privileges of being at the head of the state. Therefore USA has a complete dominance over the international system.
It is this dominance that I am perpetually pointing out and which I term as vicious and outrageous. For sure, this dominance is the kiss of death of USA as a superpower. Maybe the EU will become a future superpower in the coming 10 years with NATO starting to distant from USA and so to the major allies of USA in Europe like Spain, Italy and probably UK with the fall of the labour party in the upcoming election. But will the EU be able to stand against the overwhelming power of the USA or will it be China in the coming decades???

Questions without answers... [Reply to Prisheela Yusha Mottee by Bilaal Mauntah]

2006-12-19T15:10:00.000-08:00

I think that there are questions that will be left unanswered. You talked about facts as being an illusion. Yes there are facts which are only illusion. For example, to protect its own interest, a statesman can use all sort of stratagem…propaganda through the press with false information for instance. It can also use the tv to spread images which do not really reflect the truth. These are illusions and this is the game, the bet of politicians to remain on top. “The secrets” like you termed it, is the reality of facts and it is well preserved unless there are leaks! Politics is a very complex subject, be it international or domestic…there are certain answers that we won’t find but we can guess…but are our guess right? Shall we better study decisions, take the place of the decider/s (whoever it may be or whoever they may be), study each perspective of the solution and find how to elude from popular critics, our guess will come closer to the reality of facts. EVIDENCE, you will find them afterwards or maybe not because like you have said, everything is SECRET!!! But then, as a student of Political Science, will you be satisfied by “blackouts”???

Questions without answers ...[Prisheela Yusha Mottee]

2006-12-19T04:08:00.000-08:00

So ...Bill what you have written is nice ..we have to stop and have a moment of reflexion ..as you know there are many questions in our mind with no answers ..its true you have based yourself on many facts ..and lot of reading ...

Are they real facts ?? i m not sayin they are false but THE SOURCE of those facts ,the ideas ..are they real or just an illusion ?? .. in this international system there are many secrets ..The only truth is death ..death of soldiers ,civils, innocent and DEMONS..

Well after reading what you said ,the questions in my mind are ..Who gave orders to kill? Who is behind this master plan ??Is it one person or a group of person ...

I guess its just the system ...the international system

The system cannot be changed but a virus can destroy it ..

Iraq after Invasion: For Better or Worse?

2006-12-18T20:40:00.000-08:00

A prominent American journalist writes: "Despite the investment that has undoubtedly taken place, virtually all basic services are in a worse state now than they were before the invasion. There is less clean water, less sewage control, less gas, less petrol, less power. Baghdad now has an average of only 5.8 hours of electricity a day. At present Iraq is producing 1.8 million barrels of oil a day; just before the invasion the figure was 2.5 million barrels a day.

Dr. Muqtedar Khan is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science and International Relations at the University of Delaware. He is a Non-resident Fellow at the Brookings Institution. He is the author of American Muslims: Bridging Faith and Freedom (Amana, 2002), Jihad for Jerusalem: Identity and Strategy in International Relations (Praeger, 2004).

According to Dr. Muqtedar Khan ,"much of this isn't the fault of the coalition: power, water and oil are particular targets for the insurgents. But the failure of the coalition to protect these supplies makes people angry."

He just published one of his works:Jihad for Jerusalem .It advances a theory of agency in international politics. This theory of agency is based on a reconstituted constructivist paradigm. The theory is tested by an examination of the foreign policy decision making of Iran, Israel, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia towards Israel from 1967-1997. The book uses the foreign policy of these states as cases to test the tension between religion and rationality, between identity and reason, between power and morality, and advances a constructivist theory of choice that explains the importance of the role of culture, religion, identity, and core values in international politics.

Is Saddam Hussein really culprit of genocide? [Bilaal Mauntah]

2006-12-18T11:46:00.000-08:00

During Saddam’s trial, the prosecution estimates that “180,000 Kurds were killed when Saddam's army waged a scorched-earth campaign against Kurdish separatist guerrillas, allegedly destroying hundreds of villages, killing or forcing their residents to flee”.According to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, approved and proposed for signature and ratification or accession by General Assembly resolution 260 A (III) of 9 December 1948; entry into force 12 January 1951. Article 2 defines genocide as follows: Article 2: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. Therefore Saddam is culprit of genocide according to a, b and c.

Iraq's invasion led by US forces [Bilaal Mauntah]

2006-12-18T11:42:00.000-08:00

As students of political science should we left the question of whether the invasion of Iraq was necessary and legal. Was the Iraqi regime a real threat to world’s security or more particularly a threat to US security? As per the reasons of Colin Powell at the Security Council…yes. Backed with satellite pictures he implicitly and clearly admitted that US agencies in particular the CIA found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. But then was the government of USA really interested to free the Iraqis from dictatorship and tyranny and most importantly free the world from such a supposedly big threat namely Saddam and his weapons of Mass Destruction? Certainly not. Why?
Foremost, we must try to find out when was the decision to invade Iraq taken. Certainly not after September 11. It's clear that the US-led invasion had little to do with national security or the events of September 11. The former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill revealed that just 11 days after Bush's inauguration in early 2001, regime change in Iraq was "Topic A" among the administration's national security staff. Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld then said it was important to bomb Iraq the day after the attacks in New York and Washington occurred. The decision was therefore not taken after September 11 but the government led by Bush started to talk of it after that date… We can then say that all those reasons brought forward by the administration was a pretext. A pretext for what? Economic reasons more exactly OIL??? Why not. Bush’s company Petro-Cartel almost has Iraq’s oil at present time. We can easily determine that during Saddam’s reign, USA would difficultly be able to trade with Saddam. Still the oil in Iraq represent, according to the U.S. Department of Energy “112 billion barrels of proven oil reserves, the second largest in the world (behind Saudi Arabia), along with roughly 220 billion barrels of probable and possible resources. Iraq's true potential may be far greater than this, however, as the country is relatively unexplored due to years of war and sanctions." For perspective, the Saudis have 260 billion barrels of proven reserves!!!
One problem came across the plans of the administration of invading Iraq and benefit this large reserve of oil: How to convince the Security Council that their future plans to invade Iraq is necessary, important and a question of US’ and World’s security. Then came the episode of Colin Powell at the Security Council and his supposedly weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Did these weapons really exist?? On March 7, 2003, two weeks before the United States attacked Iraq, the U.N.'s chief weapons inspector, Hans Blix, told the U.N. Security Council that Saddam Hussein's cooperation with the inspections protocol had improved to the point where it was "active or even proactive," and that the inspectors would be able to certify that Iraq was free of prohibited weapons within a few months' time. That same day, IAEA head Mohammed ElBaradei reported that there was no evidence of a current nuclear program in Iraq and flatly refuted the administration's claim that the infamous aluminium tubes cited by Colin Powell in making his case for war before the Security Council were part of a reconstituted nuclear program. Even then the government pursue in attacking Iraq and therefore this invasion by the coalition led by US forces is illegal as it was carried out without the proper approval of U.N. Security Council.